In our Helsinki to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 8 minutes, completing the 1685km route in 23h 16min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 23h 16min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 29min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1685km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
23h 16min |
23h 24min |
| Charging time: |
2h 29min |
2h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~303 kWh |
~304 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Fabryczna (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Nowostawy (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
ALDI (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Prague
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (13 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell (10 min, 16% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Bolimów (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Hotel Na Półboru (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
ALDI (19 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1685km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons