In our Helsinki to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 75 minutes, completing the 2517km route in 32h 33min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 33min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 25min
- Energy: ~462 kWh
- Distance: 2517km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
32h 33min |
33h 48min |
| Charging time: |
2h 25min |
3h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~453 kWh |
~453 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 41% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (23 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (19 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (16 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (35 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP West (15 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (35 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (53 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 2517km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 25min vs 3h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~462 kWh vs ~573 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons