In our Helsinki to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 79 minutes, completing the 2517km route in 32h 40min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 40min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 32min
- Energy: ~452 kWh
- Distance: 2517km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
32h 40min |
33h 59min |
| Charging time: |
2h 32min |
3h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~453 kWh |
~453 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 39% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (25 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (22 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (19 min, 12% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 27% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (14 min, 21% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (35 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 5:
Blue City (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP West (14 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco Teplická cesta (17 min, 12% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 12:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2517km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 32min vs 3h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~452 kWh vs ~563 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons