In our Helsinki to Vienna EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 10 minutes, completing the 1726km route in 23h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 23h 14min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 31min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1726km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
23h 14min |
23h 24min |
| Charging time: |
2h 31min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~311 kWh |
~310 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Fabryczna (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Uniwar P1 (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Purvciems (15 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (19 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Uniwar P1 (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 10:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1726km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 31min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~315 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons