In our Lisbon to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 58 minutes, completing the 1718km route in 17h 21min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 21min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1718km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
17h 21min |
18h 19min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~309 kWh |
~310 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa, Martín de Yeltes (14 min, 23% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Briviesca Sur, Briviesca (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette, Saint-Épain (10 min, 27% → 65%)
- Arrival: Paris
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Castelo Branco Leste, Castelo Branco (10 min, 31% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Cepsa, Martín de Yeltes (12 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Parking Calle Miravete, Simancas (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Estación de servicio Villaquirán, Villaquirán de los Infantes (16 min, 19% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea, Zestoa (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire Fontbelleau Bayonne Paris, Lormont (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (21 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Aire de Blois-Ménars, Villerbon (13 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 1718km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~336 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons