In our Lisbon to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 158 minutes, completing the 1718km route in 17h 21min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 21min (158 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1718km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
17h 21min |
19h 59min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
2h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~309 kWh |
~316 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa, Martín de Yeltes (14 min, 23% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Briviesca Sur, Briviesca (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette, Saint-Épain (10 min, 27% → 65%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Hotel Lusitânia, Guarda (29 min, 32% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto, Torquemada (16 min, 10% → 23%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Hotel Landa, Burgos (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Hotelandgo Arasur, Rivabellosa (19 min, 17% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de l'Océan Ouest, Castets (31 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne, Lormont (30 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Novotel Poitiers Site du Futuroscope, Chasseneuil-du-Poitou (36 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 158-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1718km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 2h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~323 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons