In our Lisbon to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Long-Range by 25 minutes, completing the 2502km route in 25h 8min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 8min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 28min
- Energy: ~389 kWh
- Distance: 2502km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
25h 8min |
25h 33min |
| Charging time: |
1h 28min |
1h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~450 kWh |
~451 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 28% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto (18 min, 24% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Lacq Audejos Sud (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Lespignan Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (10 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (14 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Estación de servicio Villaquirán (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Super-U (10 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Garonne (10 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Loupian (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de l'Arc (11 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Conioli Sud (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 9:
Sant'Ilario Sud (13 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Arno Ovest (13 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 25-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Long-Range on this 2502km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 28min vs 1h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~389 kWh vs ~440 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons