In our Ljubljana to Athens EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 6 minutes, completing the 1630km route in 18h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 18h 42min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 30min
- Energy: ~257 kWh
- Distance: 1630km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
18h 42min |
18h 48min |
| Charging time: |
2h 30min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Ljubljana (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (25 min, 53% → 99%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (22 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (23 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Ljubljana (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IKEA Zagreb (10 min, 54% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (22 min, 12% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 22% → 52%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 6-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1630km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~257 kWh vs ~297 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons