In our Ljubljana to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 71 minutes, completing the 926km route in 9h 14min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 14min (71 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~151 kWh
- Distance: 926km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 14min |
10h 25min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~167 kWh |
~167 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Ljubljana (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (10 min, 71% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (24 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Ljubljana (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Starine south (Novo Mesto - Krško) (10 min, 80% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 71-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 926km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~151 kWh vs ~153 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons