In our London to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1715km route in 17h 29min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 29min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1715km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 29min |
17h 39min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~309 kWh |
~311 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Express (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Margaretengürtel (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1715km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~315 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons