In our London to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 87 minutes, completing the 2129km route in 24h 18min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 18min (87 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~347 kWh
- Distance: 2129km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
24h 18min |
25h 45min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
2h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~383 kWh |
~387 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Het Gevlocht (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 17% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Het Goor (10 min, 20% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
A2 Bottrop Süd (11 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Total Autohof (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohaus König (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Karczma Rzym (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Biedronka (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 10:
Circle K (30 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 87-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2129km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 2h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~347 kWh vs ~476 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons