In our London to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Maxus MIFA 9 by 220 minutes, completing the 2129km route in 24h 18min. The key advantage? 9 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 18min (220 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~347 kWh
- Distance: 2129km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Maxus MIFA 9 |
| Travel time |
24h 18min |
27h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
4h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
15 |
| Energy used |
~383 kWh |
~385 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Het Gevlocht (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Maxus MIFA 9 Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 27% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 29% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Het Goor (10 min, 18% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (15 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Vellern Süd (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (14 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Hansestraße (16 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Autohof (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 10:
MOP Koryta (13 min, 11% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
MOP Konarzewo (18 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 12:
Karczma Rzym (20 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 13:
Kaufland (89 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 14:
Kulturos centras (30 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 15:
VS Express (16 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 220-minute advantage over Maxus MIFA 9 on this 2129km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 4h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~347 kWh vs ~532 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons