In our London to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Fisker Ocean Extrem by 79 minutes, completing the 2445km route in 25h 9min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 9min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~399 kWh
- Distance: 2445km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Fisker Ocean Extrem |
| Travel time |
25h 9min |
26h 28min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~440 kWh |
~446 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 39% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Trieben (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Fisker Ocean Extrem Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tango (10 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (11 min, 11% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Kammern (11 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 19% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 15% → 37%)
-
Stop 11:
Route 80 (10 min, 10% → 33%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Fisker Ocean Extrem on this 2445km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 2h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~399 kWh vs ~454 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons