In our London to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 23 minutes, completing the 1663km route in 17h 7min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 7min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1663km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
17h 7min |
17h 30min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 39% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Trieben (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 28% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tienbaan (10 min, 19% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
E-Maxx Ladepark (10 min, 15% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Seidl Confiserie (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1663km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~271 kWh vs ~294 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons