In our Lyon to Paris EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 2 minutes, completing the 464km route in 4h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 16, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 4h 35min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 18min
- Energy: ~74 kWh
- Distance: 464km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
4h 35min |
4h 37min |
| Charging time: |
18min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~84 kWh |
~84 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Lyon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (18 min, 11% → 63%)
- Arrival: Paris
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Lyon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de la Couline (10 min, 31% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 2-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 464km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 18min vs 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~74 kWh vs ~85 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons