In our Madrid to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 30 minutes, completing the 2536km route in 25h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 41min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 35min
- Energy: ~395 kWh
- Distance: 2536km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 11min |
25h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~456 kWh |
~459 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (11 min, 45% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 14% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Monte Alto Sud (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 7:
Petrol (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2536km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 35min vs 1h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~395 kWh vs ~466 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons