In our Madrid to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1471km route in 15h 18min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 18min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~229 kWh
- Distance: 1471km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
15h 18min |
15h 32min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~265 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Tricastin (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Mouxy (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (11 min, 45% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Tricastin (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Mouxy (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1471km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~229 kWh vs ~270 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons