In our Madrid to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 76 minutes, completing the 2358km route in 24h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 50min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~385 kWh
- Distance: 2358km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
24h 50min |
26h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~424 kWh |
~425 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire De Livron (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Backstage Pub (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 41% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana (17 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
ANDGO (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Loupian (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire De Livron (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de la Ripaille (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Migrol Westside (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Süd (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
JET Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2358km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 2h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~385 kWh vs ~386 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons