In our Madrid to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 79 minutes, completing the 2358km route in 24h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 50min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~385 kWh
- Distance: 2358km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
24h 50min |
26h 9min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
2h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~424 kWh |
~425 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire De Livron (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Backstage Pub (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (12 min, 35% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Pia (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Loupian (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire De Livron (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de la Ripaille (24 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Recharge Kölliken Süd (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
HOFER (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 11:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2358km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 2h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~385 kWh vs ~410 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons