In our Madrid to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Fisker Ocean Extrem by 42 minutes, completing the 3159km route in 35h 5min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 35h 5min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 33min
- Energy: ~492 kWh
- Distance: 3159km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Fisker Ocean Extrem |
| Travel time |
35h 5min |
35h 47min |
| Charging time: |
2h 33min |
3h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~569 kWh |
~562 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (21 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (41 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Fisker Ocean Extrem Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (19 min, 13% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de l'Arc (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Conioli Sud (13 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Stura Est (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (26 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (76 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 42-minute advantage over Fisker Ocean Extrem on this 3159km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 33min vs 3h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~492 kWh vs ~587 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons