In our Madrid to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 25h 56min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 56min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 1min |
25h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~406 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (11 min, 21% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Géant Casino (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Relais de la Ronde (20 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Bosc-Mesnil (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 23% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Est (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Saugon Est (16 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Longué-les-Cossonnières (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Bosc-Mesnil (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Village Hotel (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 12% → 20%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~369 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons