In our Madrid to Milan EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 48 minutes, completing the 1544km route in 16h 1min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 1min (48 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 47min
- Energy: ~252 kWh
- Distance: 1544km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
16h 1min |
16h 49min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
1h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~278 kWh |
~278 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Calle Gaspar Torrente, Saragossa (12 min, 35% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Pia, Pia (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Loupian, Loupian (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Stura Est, Belforte Monferrato (10 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 48-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1544km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 47min vs 1h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~252 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons