In our Madrid to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 76 minutes, completing the 3033km route in 32h 37min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 12 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 37min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 12
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~557 kWh
- Distance: 3033km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
32h 37min |
33h 53min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
3h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
15 |
| Energy used |
~546 kWh |
~547 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger E.Leclerc Express (11 min, 17% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger N10 (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Blois-Ménars (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Bauer Paris Occasion (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Carrefour Valenciennes (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Debyestraße (10 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Ostetal Süd (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Clever Erhvervspark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 11% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Restaurante Jundiz (16 min, 11% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Géant Casino (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger N10 (18 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Blois-Ménars (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Bauer Paris Occasion (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Carrefour Valenciennes (16 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's Debyestraße (19 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
KFC (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Decathlon (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 12:
Clever Erhvervspark (12 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 13:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 14:
McDonald's (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 15:
Tradenvägen (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 3033km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 12 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 3h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~557 kWh vs ~678 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons