In our Madrid to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 89 minutes, completing the 2221km route in 21h 50min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 50min (89 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~346 kWh
- Distance: 2221km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
21h 50min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
2h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~400 kWh |
~401 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Est (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Super U (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Lidl (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (13 min, 12% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Porte d'Alsace Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
ATU (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Rastplatz Stocker Holz Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (13 min, 47% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hôtel Loreak (34 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Super U (26 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Hôtel Akena Besançon (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Norma (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz Stocker Holz Süd (16 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 89-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2221km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~346 kWh vs ~364 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons