In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron by 44 minutes, completing the 1923km route in 19h 49min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 49min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~314 kWh
- Distance: 1923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 49min |
20h 33min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice, La Almunia de Doña Godina (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
ANDGO, La Jonquera (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Loupian, Loupian (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (16 min, 18% → 76%)
-
Stop 8:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (10 min, 23% → 63%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron on this 1923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~314 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons