In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi SQ6 e-tron by 24 minutes, completing the 1923km route in 19h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 49min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~314 kWh
- Distance: 1923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi SQ6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 49min |
20h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi SQ6 e-tron Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Parque Deportivo Ebro, Zaragoza (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages, Bages (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (15 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Sant'Ilario Sud, Genova (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 24-minute advantage over Audi SQ6 e-tron on this 1923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~314 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons