In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron by 15 minutes, completing the 1923km route in 19h 43min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 43min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~299 kWh
- Distance: 1923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 43min |
19h 58min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Calle Gaspar Torrente, Saragossa (10 min, 38% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (10 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Lespignan Sud, Lespignan (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (10 min, 11% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Sant'Ilario Sud, Genova (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron on this 1923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~299 kWh vs ~302 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons