In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 118 minutes, completing the 1923km route in 19h 43min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 43min (118 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~299 kWh
- Distance: 1923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 43min |
21h 41min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice, La Almunia de Doña Godina (22 min, 20% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (19 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Pia, Pia (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Loupian, Loupian (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Sant'Ilario Sud, Genova (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 118-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~299 kWh vs ~303 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons