In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 176 minutes, completing the 1927km route in 20h 11min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 11min (176 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~354 kWh
- Distance: 1927km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
20h 11min |
23h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
3h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~347 kWh |
~348 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice, La Almunia de Doña Godina (11 min, 45% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages, Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (20 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
AVIA, Cetina (25 min, 56% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Tankstelle Petromiralles, Tàrrega (49 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
ibis Styles Figueres Ronda, Figueres (15 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Pia, Pia (14 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Loupian, Loupian (22 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Aire de Vidauban Sud, Vidauban A67 (23 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Marina di Varazze, Varazze (14 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger, Forte dei Marmi (22 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (29 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 176-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 1927km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 3h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~354 kWh vs ~398 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons