In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 348 minutes, completing the 1924km route in 20h 28min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 27,840 less, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 348 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 20h 28min (348 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 1924km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
20h 28min |
26h 16min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
5h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Restaurante Cafeteria Valdeherrera, Calatayud (10 min, 49% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (13 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
ANDGO, La Jonquera (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Loupian, Loupian (10 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (13 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Conioli Sud, Santo Stefano al Mare (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Sant'Ilario Sud, Genova (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hostal Torremar, Medinaceli (10 min, 51% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Estación de Servicio El Portazgo Repsol, Saragossa (65 min, 11% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Tankstelle Petromiralles, Tàrrega (65 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
ibis Styles Figueres Ronda, Figueres (39 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Novotel Hotel, Narbonne (17 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Logis Nîmotel, Nimes (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Aire de Vidauban Sud, Vidauban A67 (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Polygone Riviera, Cagnes-sur-Mer (22 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Marina di Varazze, Varazze (21 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 10:
Tesla Supercharger, Forte dei Marmi (22 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger La Pergola, Magliano (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 348-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1924km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 5h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~466 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons