In our Madrid to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 100 minutes, completing the 2921km route in 30h 10min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 12, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 10min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~477 kWh
- Distance: 2921km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
30h 10min |
31h 50min |
| Charging time: |
2h 6min |
4h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~526 kWh |
~534 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (26 min, 35% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aeroport de Girona (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Loupian (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Conioli Sud (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Stura Est (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Monte Alto Sud (22 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Nord Est Mall (24 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (38 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV A1 (50 min, 10% → 93%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2921km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 4h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~477 kWh vs ~508 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons