In our Madrid to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi S6 Avant e-tron by 43 minutes, completing the 2921km route in 29h 57min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 57min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 53min
- Energy: ~455 kWh
- Distance: 2921km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi S6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
29h 57min |
30h 40min |
| Charging time: |
1h 53min |
2h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~526 kWh |
~527 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (11 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi S6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Restaurante Cafeteria Valdeherrera (10 min, 54% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana (14 min, 25% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 10% → 85%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Audi S6 Avant e-tron on this 2921km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 53min vs 2h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~455 kWh vs ~531 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons