In our Madrid to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 14 minutes, completing the 2943km route in 30h 10min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 10min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~480 kWh
- Distance: 2943km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 24min |
30h 10min |
| Charging time: |
2h 11min |
2h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~530 kWh |
~526 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Restaurante Cafeteria Valdeherrera (10 min, 47% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Vila Sana (12 min, 14% → 84%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (12 min, 18% → 76%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (12 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 6:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Nord Est Mall (11 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Shell (11 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 17% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2943km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 2h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~480 kWh vs ~579 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons