In our Milan to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 874km route in 9h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 24min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~143 kWh
- Distance: 874km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 24min |
9h 55min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~157 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (10 min, 44% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY E. Leclerc (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Sonnenberg Ost (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Keskastel Est (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shopping Cora (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 874km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~143 kWh vs ~144 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons