In our Milan to Brussels EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 3 minutes, completing the 874km route in 9h 29min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance's 524km range doesn't beat the Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 29min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 874km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
9h 29min |
9h 32min |
| Charging time: |
25min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~157 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (13 min, 37% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY E. Leclerc (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Sonnenberg Ost (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Keskastel Est (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shopping Cora (10 min, 20% → 62%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 3-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 874km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons