In our Milan to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 97 minutes, completing the 1540km route in 15h 50min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 50min (97 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1540km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 50min |
17h 27min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
2h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~277 kWh |
~278 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Rousset (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Gasparets (12 min, 12% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Castellaro Nord (12 min, 22% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Rousset (12 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
ibis Styles Figueres Ronda (26 min, 11% → 75%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Vila Sana (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Ariza Norte (22 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 97-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1540km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~240 kWh vs ~245 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons