In our Munich to Amsterdam EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 13 minutes, completing the 806km route in 8h 40min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 40min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~158 kWh
- Distance: 806km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
8h 53min |
8h 40min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Euro Hotel, Wertheim (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Medenbach Ost, Medenbach (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost, Bad Honnef (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Helderloh, Rees (15 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord, Esselbach (15 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststätte Epgert, Hümmerich (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Helderloh, Rees (11 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 13-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 806km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons