In our Munich to Amsterdam EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 2 minutes, completing the 830km route in 8h 40min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 40min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 830km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
8h 42min |
8h 40min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
AVIA Tankstelle Hochstraße, München (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord, Esselbach (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
OBI Markt, Limburg an der Lahn (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Königsforst Ost, Rösrath (10 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Helderloh, Rees (12 min, 12% → 53%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord, Esselbach (15 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststätte Epgert, Hümmerich (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Helderloh, Rees (11 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 2-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 830km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons