In our Munich to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 1 minutes, completing the 588km route in 5h 56min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 56min (1 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~94 kWh
- Distance: 588km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 57min |
5h 56min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~106 kWh |
~106 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 48% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (11 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Autohof (13 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald Ost (15 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 1-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 588km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~94 kWh vs ~130 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons