In our Munich to Hamburg EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 25 minutes, completing the 778km route in 7h 42min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 7h 42min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~143 kWh
- Distance: 778km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
7h 42min |
8h 7min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
37min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~140 kWh |
~132 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telekom Gutenbergstraße, Bamberg (12 min, 52% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Harz Ost, Seesen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Hamburg
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastanlage Coburger Forst Ost, Ebersdorf bei Coburg (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
SB Möbel Boss, Mühlhausen (13 min, 13% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Hannover-Wülferode Ost, Hannover (14 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Hamburg
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 25-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 778km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons