In our Munich to Nice EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 27 minutes, completing the 802km route in 8h 22min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 22min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 15min
- Energy: ~131 kWh
- Distance: 802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
8h 22min |
8h 49min |
| Charging time: |
15min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~144 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Villoresi Ovest, Lainate (15 min, 12% → 71%)
- Arrival: Nice
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Migrol Service Staatsstrasse, Trübbach (10 min, 35% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Centro Shopping Serfontana, Morbio Inferiore (12 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest, Belforte Monferrato (16 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 27-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 15min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~131 kWh vs ~137 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons