In our Munich to Nice EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 5 minutes, completing the 803km route in 8h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 49min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
8h 54min |
8h 49min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
41min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~144 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
GoFast McDonald's, Zizers (10 min, 24% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
GOFAST Swissminiatur, Melide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Ewiva Dorno Ovest, Dorno (16 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Rinovo Nord, Andora (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Nice
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Raststätte Viamala, Thusis (15 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Muggiano Ovest, Milano (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest, Belforte Monferrato (16 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 5-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons