In our Munich to Nice EV duel, the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 9 minutes, completing the 803km route in 8h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID. Buzz Pro LR's 389km range doesn't beat the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range's 380km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range
- Total time: 8h 49min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~137 kWh
- Distance: 803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
8h 58min |
8h 49min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
GoFast McDonald's, Zizers (10 min, 29% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
GOFAST Swissminiatur, Melide (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Ewiva Dorno Ovest, Dorno (20 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Rinovo Nord, Andora (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Nice
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Migrol Service Staatsstrasse, Trübbach (10 min, 35% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Centro Shopping Serfontana, Morbio Inferiore (12 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest, Belforte Monferrato (16 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Won
The Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range achieved a 9-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~137 kWh vs ~178 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons