In our Munich to Paris EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Kia EV9 by 20 minutes, completing the 823km route in 8h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia EV9's 450km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 8h 0min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~145 kWh
- Distance: 823km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
8h 20min |
8h 0min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~148 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Burger King E.Leclerc, Soufflenheim (10 min, 27% → 31%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Keskastel Est, Keskastel (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire Reims Champagne Nord, Billy-le-Grand (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Keskastel Est, Keskastel (10 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin, Valmy (10 min, 14% → 53%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 20-minute advantage over Kia EV9 on this 823km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~145 kWh vs ~174 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons