In our Munich to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Genesis Electrified G80 by 18 minutes, completing the 899km route in 9h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 0min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 24min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 899km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Genesis Electrified G80 |
| Travel time |
9h 0min |
9h 18min |
| Charging time: |
24min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (10 min, 73% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Badia Nuova Ovest, Castiglione dei Pepoli (14 min, 11% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Genesis Electrified G80 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (10 min, 64% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (15 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over Genesis Electrified G80 on this 899km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 24min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~173 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons