In our Munich to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range by 14 minutes, completing the 899km route in 9h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 0min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 24min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 899km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range |
| Travel time |
9h 0min |
9h 14min |
| Charging time: |
24min |
33min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (10 min, 73% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Badia Nuova Ovest, Castiglione dei Pepoli (14 min, 11% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (13 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (10 min, 16% → 54%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Long-Range on this 899km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 24min vs 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~151 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons