In our Munich to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 40 minutes, completing the 901km route in 9h 3min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 9h 3min (40 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~135 kWh
- Distance: 901km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
9h 43min |
9h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (12 min, 54% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (10 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (11 min, 14% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 40-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 901km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 1h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~135 kWh vs ~142 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons