In our Nice to Munich EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 804km route in 8h 23min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 23min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 12min
- Energy: ~125 kWh
- Distance: 804km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 23min |
8h 54min |
| Charging time: |
12min |
41min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Raststätte Viamala (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ricarica Dorno Est (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bellinzona Sud (10 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 804km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 12min vs 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~125 kWh vs ~133 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons