In our Nice to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 10 minutes, completing the 806km route in 9h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 2min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~127 kWh
- Distance: 806km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 12min |
9h 2min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ricarica Dorno Est (12 min, 23% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Bellinzona Sud (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Hohenems (10 min, 16% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ricarica Dorno Est (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Area Servizio Coldrerio Est (15 min, 17% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 806km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~127 kWh vs ~178 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons