In our Nice to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 34 minutes, completing the 931km route in 8h 57min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 57min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~152 kWh
- Distance: 931km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 57min |
9h 31min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~168 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire De Livron (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire des Lochères (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Tricastin (10 min, 15% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire De Livron (10 min, 32% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Taponas (12 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Mobilize Lounge Avia (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de la Couline (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 931km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~152 kWh vs ~154 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons